【黃玉順】神圣超出的哲學重建 ——《周易甜心一包養網》與現象學的啟示

The philosopher has appeared for the first time, and people dare to rely on their own. The Chinese mysteries and wandering fools, Indian ascetics, Greek philosophers and Israel’s prophets, despite their distinct differences in their worship and thinking content and internal temperament, are all classified as philosophers. People have proven that they have talents and compare themselves with the entire universe in terms of energy. He discovered within himself that the foundation of origin that could advance him to himself and the world. [6]

The “whole universe” mentioned here, that is, what Heidegger calls “the whole of being” or “the existence is an existence”, he pointed out: “From the beginning of philosophy, and through this opening, the existence of being presents itself as the basis. …It is in the real state of an existence The reason is the prenatal ability to establish the objectivity of the object, the proof mediator of the process of energy movement and historical generation, and the strong will of the value setting. “[7] Regarding this ultimate “original” manifestation in the history of Eastern philosophy, Heidegger actually traces the philosophy of Aristotle, Descartes, Hegel and Nietzsche. [8] But what Jaspers calls the existence of “the foundation of origin above the world” refers to an absolute “transcendent”.

This transcendent is originally “above the world”, and of course it is even more above people, that is, “external transcendence” for people and their world, that is, “external transcendence”. This is the transcendent concept before the beginning of the mind period, that is, philosophy, such as the “gods” and “God” in the East, and the “emperor” and “heaven” in the Yin and Zhou dynasties in China, whose position is “high and unparalleled”[9]; not only this transcendent is originally sacred, it is “sacred transcendence”. When philosophy is learned, people “compare themselves with the entire universe” and “discover the source foundation that can advance them to themselves and the world” inside, which means that people themselves act as the transcendent; but this transcendent is now 5:50, and there are still five minutes to get off work. The person is set in the “inner of oneself”, that is, the so-called “immanent transcendence”.

The so-called “inner beyond” is a broadly transmissible theory proposed by Mou Zongsan and others. It is believed that the characteristic of Chinese philosophy is “innerinclusive appexceeding” is different from and superior to the “inner beyond” of Oriental Philosophy and civilization.[10] Such two judgments are actually most basic and cannot be established. I call them “the two teachings of ‘inner beyond’”, because in fact the mainstream of Oriental Philosophy is also intrinsically beyond, and may not be superior.[11] According to the discussion above, we can say this: the opposite of “inner beyond” and “inner beyond”, On a very large level, it is actually the opposition between philosophy and religion, or perhaps the opposition between sensibility and worship, the opposition between secularity and divinity.

If we change the word, it is: the philosophical business means that human thinking and conception embarks on the path of “humanism” (humanism or translation of “humanism”). However, humanism is actually a double blade. The essence of humanism is what Nietzsche calls “God is dead”, that is, man replaces the original divine transcendent. In this way, People can use their sensibility to see it and act as if they are sensible. Fortunately, the humanism of the philosophical sensibility of the East has failed to think about the realm of civilization alone, and the sacred transcends the world and is exhibited in a new form. Unfortunately, since the revival of modern literature, the sacred transcends the world. The day after day, the humanistic theory began to move into a new stage of transformation and expansion. Although the philosophical and emotional theory has achieved more and more important problems, it also brings more important problems. Among them, it is particularly worthy of warning that power – including capital power and political power Desire.

Even though Kant said, “I have to place knowledge in order to give rise to the rank of the worship”, that is, “the assumption of God, unrestrained and souls for the practical use of my sensual needs” [12], but in him, the divine transcendent is regarded only as a “assumption” (postulate or translation “public”) of human-like realism, this is still the inner transcendent of the philosophical humanism, which lacks the existence of the true divine transcendent, and is actually God官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网

官网

官网

官网

官网

Of course, all this does not mean giving up sentiment and rejecting philosophy; but no matter what, we must fight against the tension between sensibility and worship. Therefore, the task of thinking today is to rebuild the sacred transcendence philosophically, or it may be called rebuilding worship sensually.

2. The number of repetitions and number of “photographies”

>